Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 | |
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Sultai Roots | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Bant Toxic | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | oafmcnamara | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Repurposing , 5 Color Legends , Bant Auras , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Control , Bant Doubling , Bant Gearhulk , Bant Synthesizer , Bant Tempo
Meta Performance Analysis
Botanical Sanctum ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Botanical Sanctum is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 53.09 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.2%. Botanical Sanctum has a win rate of 79.6%, making it 8.8% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dive Down | Instant | 5 | 73.3% | 2 |
| Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied | Legendary Creature — God | 6 | 70.8% | 4 |
| Armored Scrapgorger | Creature — Phyrexian Beast | 5 | 70.0% | 3 |
| Hidetsugu's Second Rite | Instant | 7 | 67.8% | 2 |
| Invasion of Tarkir | Battle — Siege | 23 | 66.8% | 5 |
| Silent Hallcreeper | Enchantment Creature — Horror | 5 | 65.5% | 1 |
| Roxanne, Starfall Savant | Legendary Creature — Cat Druid | 9 | 64.1% | 5 |
| Faerie Mastermind | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 7 | 63.4% | 1 |
| Overlord of the Boilerbilges | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 61.3% | 0 |
| Horned Loch-Whale | Creature — Whale // Instant — Adventure | 6 | 60.5% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Botanical Sanctum than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pawpatch Formation | Instant | 2 | 6 | 95.0% | 77.2% | +17.8% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 92.3% | 77.5% | +14.8% |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 7 | 77.8% | 76.9% | +0.9% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 10 | 75.0% | 77.0% | -2.0% |
| Questing Druid | Creature — Human Druid // Instant — Adventure | 2 | 6 | 75.9% | 78.1% | -2.2% |
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 72.7% | 75.1% | -2.4% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 8 | 73.9% | 76.7% | -2.8% |
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 6 | 72.7% | 75.6% | -2.9% |
| Thundertrap Trainer | Creature — Otter Wizard | 2 | 5 | 72.7% | 75.9% | -3.2% |
| Enduring Vitality | Enchantment Creature — Elk Glimmer | 3 | 5 | 72.7% | 76.2% | -3.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temur Otters | 336 | 100.0% | 42.2% |
| Simic Terror | 305 | 99.3% | 44.2% |
| Sultai Emergence | 31 | 83.8% | 13.6% |
| Unknown Archetype | 27 | 8.6% | 32.6% |
| Selesnya Cage | 23 | 9.1% | 31.6% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.